As we saw above, the hostile person is one who becomes aware that his system is not anticipating accurately, and he therefore has to choose between preserving the integrity of his system or alternatively replacing the faulty parts. Under the heading of philosophy, we saw that to construe meant to translate extralinguistic reality into our personal terms.
You must have a question in order to perceive an answer - hence the problem with education where teachers are providing answers to questions which the children have not asked. Any given construction has a limited range of application to which it may be highly pertinent, but beyond that range it may not seem so valid.
An individual with a permeable construct is open to change and may be seen by others as very open-minded; by contrast, a person with a lower permeable construct may be seen as inflexible and rigid.
Discussing constructs also helps to build shared constructs. Clinical Psychology and Personality. This line of cleavage is then labeled where possible.
Often when a client attempts to verbalize pre-verbal constructs he becomes confused and resorts to indicating the events to which Relationship between personal construct and behavior constructs apply. Constructs that are important to the person are core constructs, whilst others are called peripheral constructs.
We store experience as constructs, and then look at the world through them. We can choose to gain new experiences to expand our constructs or stay in the safe but limiting zone of current constructs. In choosing, our anticipations tell us which pole of our dichotomous construct to select in order to make the best sense of the impending events and to elaborate our sense-making system.
Kelly summarised this aspect of his theory in the Choice Corollary which says - "A person chooses for himself that alternative in a dichotomized construct through which he anticipates the greater possibility for extension and definition of his system".
Defending When you are building new ideas, consider where these have come from. Kelly was concerned to create a new approach which still had as its focus of convenience the psychological approach to the person as opposed to a sociological or medical or other approach.
Behaviour is therefore "the instrument of its own exploration". Ask the most foolish question you can imagine and, sure enough, someone will offer an answer". These may be dictated by different contexts and roles.
This is dealt with in the theory under the Sociality Corollary which states - "To the extent that one person construes the construction processes of another, he may play a role in a social process involving the other person". Further, the meaning of the construct is created by the tension of the opposite poles.
He went on to state that "since I assume that we start with a process I am struck with the disturbing thought that personal construct theory may be the only truly dynamic theory available to psychology". The major reviews of his work were positive and enthusiastic particularly those written by Jerome Bruner  and Carl Rogers.
In this way all our construals or interpretations about the universe can, with time, be scientifically evaluated as long as we remain open to invalidating evidence. Life only makes sense when we plot it along this dimension. Kelly has summarised this aspect of his theory in the Construction Corollary which states - "A person anticipates events by construing their replications".
No matter how aware one is that the child is father of the construing man there are many pre-verbal constructs which can never be articulated in language. We separate events one from the other by chopping up time into appropriate lengths or segments.
Personal constructs are ways of anticipating social experiences and anticipations guide behavior and experience. The world is construed as ever changing, humans are seen as a form of process who are in the business of continually changing and updating their constructions of the universe.
Heraclitus is credited with saying "you cannot step twice into the same river, for fresh waters are ever flowing in upon you". Vaihinger suggested that man could best approach reality in a hypothetical manner, that is, instead of making a definite statement such as "this child is aggressive", we instead ask ourselves "what happens if we look at this child "as if" he were aggressive?
Kelly described this latter approach as "accumulative fragmentalism" and it is against this philosophy that his position of constructive alternativism stands opposed.
In this way we may anticipate future events having construed their past replications.
Human behaviour is not seen as a problem which needs to be controlled, but rather is construed as our main instrument of inquiry.Personal Construct Theory explains how we create constructs in order to understand the world.
the detail of constructs are particular to the individual and hence are called personal constructs. All of these are constructs that I have created or learned in order to explain the behavior of teenagers I have met.
So what? Using it. Listen. The relationship between personal construct and behavior is that, personal construct is how a person views life, the world and people around them base on their past experiences.
Behavior is how a person act in. Personal construct theory suggests that people develop personal constructs about how the world works. “Behavior is not the answer to the psychologist’s question; it is the question,” he suggested.
and weigh his experimental evidence? And, if so, might not the differences between the personal viewpoints of different men correspond. “Intimacy is one of the most salient and rewarding aspects of personal relationships regarding associations between five-factor personality variables and relationship constructs by using both factors and facets; considering love styles, intimacy, and satisfaction; and examining possible mediation effects of love styles between.
Nov 30, · It may be a little tough to differentiate between personality and behaviour at times. But, of course, you should not confuse the two terms.
Personality defines you, while behavior defines your reaction in a particular setting. People often end up concluding that personality is something that describes how people behave/10(6).
What is the relationship between personal constructs and behavior? I think that personal constructs influence individual’s behavior and reactions in some situations as well. Personal constructs give space to comparisons between situations and people, which individuals then choose to act upon after review of these comparisons%(1).Download